Web3 Application & API VAPT
dApps, off-chain APIs, wallet connectivity, authentication, privileged endpoints and transaction-request manipulation.
Discuss this scopeDigital Assets • Custody • Wallets • Tokenisation
Digital-asset security needs both technical depth and regulated financial-control understanding. Platform APIs, signing and custody procedures, smart contracts, privileged access and operational processes form one interconnected attack surface.
Security, technology risk and assurance should reflect the critical processes and decision responsibilities of the organisation.
Digital-asset security needs both technical depth and regulated financial-control understanding. Platform APIs, signing and custody procedures, smart contracts, privileged access and operational processes form one interconnected attack surface.
Six practical entry points, each designed around an industry decision and the supporting 8i service expertise.
dApps, off-chain APIs, wallet connectivity, authentication, privileged endpoints and transaction-request manipulation.
Discuss this scopeMPC/HSM controls, signing authorisations, multisig, hot/cold wallet operations, recovery and dual-control workflows.
Discuss this scopeDigital-asset risk governance, custody operations, change management, controls evidence and regulatory readiness.
Discuss this scopeNodes, RPC, validators, cloud configurations, oracle/bridge dependencies and trusted boundaries.
Discuss this scopeIssuance/redemption controls, transaction integrity, custody and settlement integrations, supplier and go-live readiness.
Discuss this scopeContract logic, upgradeability and protocol risks where blockchain-specific specialist competence is confirmed; distinct from dApp VAPT.
Discuss this scopeAssessment criteria reflect the organisation’s activities, technology environment and applicable regulatory requirements.
Cybersecurity, custody and external-assessment expectations are relevant to the defined platform activity. A formal SFC VATP licensing external-assessment sign-off is separate from VAPT or readiness support.
Assess on-chain/off-chain trust, signing, interfaces, infrastructure, authorisations, recovery and third-party dependencies. Full protocol audits need specifically verified language and protocol expertise.
Specialist smart-contract source review, protocol analysis and formal verification can be considered as separately defined assessment disciplines.
The final deliverables depend on the commissioned scope. Typical work products include:
Web3 dApp/API security assessment and finding evidence
Wallet/custody signing and privileged-control review
Regulatory technology control readiness report
Tokenisation/cloud/supplier go-live assurance findings
Start with one assessment or commission an integrated engagement with accountable scope and deliverables.
VAPT • Attack Surface Inspection • Web, Mobile & API Penetration Testing • Red / Purple Team Assessment
Technology risk management, IT GRC, control effectiveness, IT audit and regulatory assurance.
Supplier assurance, cloud and outsourcing security, architecture, IV&V, migration and go-live readiness.
Continuous exposure assessment, vulnerability governance, incident readiness, recovery assurance and SOC effectiveness assessment.
Relevant supervisory guidance and industry frameworks inform control objectives, evidence requests and assurance reporting.
APIs, apps, privileged endpoints, transaction flows, custody workflows and blockchain-facing infrastructure.
Official guidance / frameworkCustody, key management, authentication and technology-control readiness; formal sign-offs require specifically eligible auditors.
Official guidance / frameworkDigital-asset operational controls, wallets, keys, CISO arrangements, cybersecurity testing and incident readiness for relevant VASPs.
Official guidance / frameworkOperational cyber risk, digital-asset custody controls and related regulatory-readiness assessment where applicable.
Official guidance / frameworkRequirements are jurisdiction-, entity-, data- and activity-specific. Regulatory interpretation, formal audit opinions and provider authorisations are determined separately.
Previous specialist experience helps inform our assessment approach to the relevant technical, regulatory and business risks.
Hands-on cybersecurity and technology governance experience in virtual-asset environments, covering VAPT, digital-asset custody-related controls, internal attack simulation and licensing-readiness activities.
Previous professional penetration-testing and red-team work alongside authorised security research across web applications, APIs, exposed enterprise assets and digital-asset technologies.
A differentiated combination of advanced VAPT, threat-informed red/blue team assessment, platform and wallet controls, management risk and regulated digital-asset expectations.
Experience in leading exchange-scale environments: application access, exposed interfaces, platform privileges and practical attack-path validation.
Review privileged transaction permissions, key lifecycles, custody segregation, recovery and evidence supporting residual-risk decisions.
Regulatory guidance informs technical risk and control reviews. Formal external assurance opinions require separately eligible providers where prescribed.
Tell us about your technology environment, security concerns or upcoming regulatory and programme priorities. We’ll help scope the right specialist assessment or advisory engagement.